Válnar Studios™: 2025-09-28

Saturday, October 4, 2025

Exposé: The Public Hypocrisy of Ellis Rolt Pearce (@nightmare_squishmellow)

For more than two years, Ellis Rolt Pearce of London, England — known online as @nightmare_squishmellow — has waged a smear campaign against Nightbane Ulfrik Válnar and the Válnar Studios family. What began as minor online drama turned into a full-scale character assassination attempt built on lies, projection, and deflection.

But while Pearce has been shouting her accusations into the digital void, her own public posts and videos reveal a record of hypocrisy, contradiction, and attention-seeking chaos that dismantles every moral stance she tries to take. The evidence speaks for itself.

1. The False Accusations

Over the last two years, Pearce has accused Nightbane of everything from “abuse” to being affiliated with NAMBLA — outrageous claims for which she has never produced a single shred of evidence. Each time she is confronted for proof, she moves the goalposts, inventing new narratives to keep herself relevant in the drama cycle.

Behind the curtain, this pattern is textbook projection. Those who scream “predator” the loudest online are often trying to bury something of their own — and in Pearce’s case, her own words paint the picture.

In a recent video posted publicly under her handle, Pearce made the following statements (verbatim):

Video Made September 21, 2025

“I would implore you to ask people who know him, who have actually gone against him, because he claimed that I lied. And yes, he did doctor some things, and I will say that now. And he has also said that he lived with a registered sex offender multiple times, which would be his partner's brother. Which is fucking weird considering apparently she's got kids. Those were his words.

Now, I've gone against Scorpius, aka Joseph Wolfe, who also stands up for Nambula. Yeah, didn't know that until it was brought to my attention. I don't support that shit. I have young cousins. I don't support Nambula. I don't support any pedophiles. That is something I will never do.

So, I'mma let Dragon deal with this one and everyone else dogpile his ass because I've already had my fun against him. He's just a dumbass who realised a bit too late and he played fuck around find out with the wrong people. And now he's back for more. How fun.”

2. Her Own Words Tell the Story

On February 22, 2025, Pearce posted a long defensive message publicly addressing accusations of inappropriate behavior. The text reads:

“Yes I said I talk to kids as in my actual cousins so if u wanna label me a p3do just know I know my whole criminal history and records I can get them and will easily dox myself. They use their parents accounts to contact me as their yellow person and their safe person over their own parents. I am THAT auntie.”

No one forced her to write that. No one twisted her arm to bring up her own “criminal history.”
This is not the statement of someone falsely accused out of nowhere — it’s the statement of someone who feels the walls closing in.

When someone accuses others of being dangerous, yet publicly volunteers this kind of statement about “kids” and “criminal records,” it raises the kind of questions she wishes would never be asked.

3. The TikTok Contradiction

Then there’s the visual evidence. On September 23, 2025, Pearce uploaded a TikTok video under the same handle, @nightmare_squishmellow. In it, she appears topless, performing to music in a sexually suggestive way — on a platform heavily populated by minors.

She tagged the post with #sisters4life, #chosenfamily, #nofucs2give, and similar hashtags. The video remained public, visible to anyone, with no content warnings or age restrictions.

It’s her right to post what she wants — but doing so on a children-accessible platform while simultaneously accusing others of being “predators” is the definition of hypocrisy. You cannot throw stones from inside a glass house made of your own content.

4. The Timeline of Deception

2022–2023: Pearce begins inserting herself into the Válnar Studios orbit, positioning as a “supporter” while gathering personal information and later twisting it into half-truths.
Early 2023: After being confronted for manipulative behavior, she leaves voluntarily — then begins launching attacks against Nightbane, Chrissy (Black Widow Dolly), and other Wolfpack members.
June 19, 2024: Starts posting revealing TikTok videos on an open profile while continuing to spread moral accusations against others.
February 2025: Posts a lengthy public message referencing “kids” and her “criminal history,” while portraying herself as the victim.
Present Day: Doubles down on new lies — now accusing Nightbane of supporting NAMBLA — without offering a single receipt.

5. The Pattern: Accuse Loudly, Defend Poorly

What we’re seeing is not random chaos. It’s a pattern — one that anyone familiar with online pathology will recognize.
When people like Pearce feel their own credibility slipping, they reach for shock accusations. They hope that by screaming something vile first, they can drown out the evidence of their own behavior.

But the internet has a long memory, and screenshots don’t forget.

Every accusation she’s hurled at Válnar Studios has been met with zero proof, while every contradiction of hers comes from her own public pages. The hypocrisy is staggering — and public.

6. The Receipts

Exhibit A:
Screenshot dated February 22, 2025, where Pearce acknowledges accusations of being labeled a “p3do” and references her “criminal history.”

Exhibit B:
Screenshot dated September 23, 2025, from her TikTok profile @nightmare_squishmellow, showing revealing content posted publicly with hashtags and engagement from other users.

Both exhibits are verifiable and have been preserved with timestamps and direct URLs.

7. Final Words

This exposé is not about revenge — it’s about record.
When someone spends years defaming others without proof, the only rational response is to let their own words do the talking.

Every image, every post, and every statement here was created by Ellis Rolt Pearce herself. No manipulation, no distortion — just receipts.

Válnar Studios doesn’t need to fabricate villains; the internet provides them, loud and unfiltered.
This isn’t a witch hunt — it’s the mirror she tried to hide from.

VÁLNAR STUDIOS
Where truth burns through hypocrisy.
Wolfpack Forever 🐺🔥

TikTok Hypocrisy: When Morality and Exploitation Collide

@nightmare_squishm

Lead

[Nashville GA] — In the endless scroll of TikTok, morality has become a performance art.
Each week a new creator emerges, claiming to “protect victims” or “expose predators.”
Yet behind the slogans and self-righteous hashtags, a darker contradiction lurks:
many of these digital vigilantes use the same feeds to broadcast sexually explicit or suggestive content — sometimes hundreds of times over — while denouncing others for indecency.

The Rise of the Moral Crusaders

The moral-outrage economy is booming.
TikTok’s algorithm rewards engagement above all else, and outrage — particularly moral outrage — is among the most clickable emotions on the platform.
A wave of self-styled crusaders have discovered that accusing strangers of misconduct can generate millions of views faster than any dance trend.

Media-ethics researchers say the pattern is clear: users construct a brand around purity, weaponise accusation as entertainment, and rely on the emotional power of moral panic to drive visibility.

“It’s activism theatre,” said Dr. Alicia Moreno, a digital-culture scholar at the University of Massachusetts.
“The problem isn’t advocacy itself — it’s when outrage becomes performance and the truth stops mattering.”

The Contradiction

One account examined by Válnar Studios investigators posted more than a hundred near-nude videos in twelve months while repeatedly accusing other creators of predatory behaviour.
The posts exist side by side — provocative content one day, condemnation the next — forming an image of purity and rebellion that defies logic.

The tactic works because both sex and scandal feed the algorithm.
The same creator can attract one audience for sensuality and another for moral crusading, effectively monopolising two of the most powerful currencies online: desire and indignation.

“When moral branding meets exhibitionism, credibility collapses,” noted Ravi Delgado, a social-media analyst based in Austin.
“But the algorithm doesn’t care who’s lying — it cares who’s loud.”

Platform Failures

TikTok’s official guidelines prohibit both harassment and sexually explicit material.
In practice, enforcement is uneven.
Reports of defamation or harassment often vanish into automated review queues, while borderline-explicit content remains public for months.

Creators who mix accusation with provocation exploit this gap.
They can violate multiple rules simultaneously — nudity and harassment — yet still flourish because moderation systems prioritise engagement over ethics.

Internal data from watchdog groups suggest that accounts accused of harassment are only suspended after repeated mass reporting, while videos flagged for nudity are usually reviewed by bots incapable of context.

The Human Toll

False accusations of sexual misconduct or grooming fall under a legal category known as defamation per se — statements so damaging that harm is presumed.
Victims of these online smear campaigns describe panic attacks, job loss, and estrangement from friends and family.

“When someone publicly calls you a predator, the accusation alone becomes the verdict,” said Elena Brooks, a media-law attorney in Chicago.
“Even if it’s retracted later, screenshots outlive apologies.”

Beyond legal consequences lies psychological wreckage.
Targets report constant hypervigilance, fearing another viral post could destroy what little reputation they have left.
Experts liken it to digital PTSD — a looping trauma triggered by notifications instead of flashbacks.

A Culture of Rewarded Hypocrisy

What makes this trend especially toxic is how profitable it is.
Performative outrage generates engagement; engagement brings monetisation.
Creators learn that the fastest way to grow is to blend sensuality with scandal, turning contradiction itself into content.

TikTok’s design encourages this duality.
The “For You Page” amplifies whatever provokes the strongest reaction — not what’s most factual.
That leaves genuine advocates buried beneath theatrics, while opportunists dominate the feed.

“Every false crusade drains credibility from real activism,” said Dr. Moreno.
“It’s the boy-who-cried-wolf problem at algorithmic scale.”

Editorial Note – Válnar Studios RAW

The hypocrisy epidemic on TikTok isn’t an isolated scandal; it’s a mirror held up to the culture of digital fame.
We’ve reached a point where moral authority can be simulated with a hashtag, and exposure pays better than empathy.
But truth still matters.

At Válnar Studios RAW, we believe in radical transparency — not revenge.
Our mission is to document the machinery of manipulation that turns human pain into entertainment and to remind creators: the internet never forgets, but it also never forgives hypocrisy.

Editor’s Note: This report is part of Válnar Studios RAW’s continuing coverage of online harassment, false accusations, and the ethics of digital rebellion.

Translate